tatjna (tatjna) wrote,

Uh oh

So I got my essay back.

Another A+.

*blinkblink* So I can argue from the feminist perpective and be convincing. Golly. Does this mean I could argue from the prohibitionist* perspective and be convincing? That might be a useful exercise.

Anyway, so I did some maths in my head, and discovered that since I've aced 50% of the course, I only have to get 14.5% in the exam to pass the course. But, um.. I've gone and set myself a precedent now, haven't I? How cool would it be for me to go back to uni after a decidedly average first attempt and a 20 year gap, and actually do really well?

This is me resolving to study lots. I had forgotten about the bit where they more or less tell you what will be in the exam. I think that'll help lots with the achieving of more than 14.5%, yep.

* Don't assume that this means I disagree with feminism as a principle the way I do with prohibition as a principle. My disagreement with feminism is mostly in the way the arguments are made - but if I can make those arguments convincingly for an essay, I can get inside them and understand the viewpoint that creates them more. Being able to do this with prohibitionism will give me good learnin's for the Futuretime methinks.

*goes to read something lightweight and easy*

(PJ O'Rourke, anyone? He cracks me the hell up)

[EDIT] And in order to prove my astounding brilliance once and for all, I just blindly sideswiped a kebab stick I was using to pick my teeth, and drove the pointy end about half an inch into the roof of my mouth (luckily on an angle). Doh.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.