Over the last few days, whenever I've seen that naked Trump… - Tactical Ninja
Aug. 21st, 2016
10:59 am
Over the last few days, whenever I've seen that naked Trump statue posted, I've dropped in and left a comment along the lines of "I'm really not down with body shaming, even of that scumbag."
A statement of my own view, or so I thought. It's been interesting to see how many people will vehemently tell me I'm wrong to feel that way, and work very hard to convince me that my perspective is invalid. Arguments used include:
"It's art!" (it is art, because art is supposed to elicit emotion and discussion - but that doesn't mean it's not also body shaming)
"Think about it in context!" (you mean the context where almost everyone is bombarded with reasons to hate their body every day, or the one where Trump is not smart enough to realise that a lot of his belittling of other people probably comes from an unacknowledged desire to make himself feel big? which probably stems from the same crap this statue is perpetuating regarding self-loathing)
"He started it!" (what are we, 4?)
"He does it to women all the time!" (and we think he's scum for it, so why is it ok to now do the same thing? does that make us scum too?)
"He said he had a huge penis though!" (and? since when are tiny penis jokes any kind of argument about anything relevant?)
"You just don't understand how it's supposed to represent the Emperor with no clothes!" (which I do actually understand, I'm just not ok with the way we're focusing on the 'nauseatingness' of his naked body as a representation of his ugliness)*
"Not everything is about you!" (um, yeah - i got nothing)
* I actually think it had the potential to be a lot better. If his naked body were painted in representations symbolic of the people who would be (are being) harmed by his policies, for example. As it is, we take the Emperor's clothes off and what's revealed is a fairly accurate representation of the body of a fat old man, and we are supposed to be nauseated by that.
I'm sorry folks, it's body shaming and I'm still not ok with it.
Note - one person out of everyone I've commented to responded with "Oh, I hadn't thought of that." and took it down. There's a reason that person is in my inner circle of friends, just saying.
I think it's a case of mud-wrestling with a pig, as the old sayings goes.
Somehow it reminds me of how the whole moral of Beauty and the Beast is undercut by the fact that the reward in the story is someone's being made conventionally beautiful.
The worst is that they did that so badly the last time to Obama and he won. I hopehopehope the current victim of shaming isn't tomorrow's president of the United States. *fingers crossed*
Not sure if it's body shaming or not, but comes under the heading of "crass ≠ clever" (at least once you're out of Junior High School), which is a general problem with the internet. Trump is a dork and if elected would be a disaster of the highest order. That should be pointed out with sense and passion, not crassness. As you say, we're not 4, or even 14.
His losing will also be a disaster, but not as bad as his winning. See post http://warriorsavant.livejournal.com/591659.html
P.S. Would it be okay for me to link to this post in my own LJ? You can absolutely say no if you'd prefer not.
There's also the fact that it would be really creepy on a visceral level if this happened to a candidate who identified as female and this kind of stupidity opens the door for someone to try that in the name of "equality".
Why couldn't they have dressed him up as royalty instead, far more topical and on point.