?

Log in

No account? Create an account

*gnng* - Tactical Ninja

Nov. 25th, 2011

01:22 pm - *gnng*

Previous Entry Share Next Entry

OK so this has been doing the rounds on Twitter: "Mum, I need your help". It's a site dedicated to convincing your Mum to vote for a particular set of values.

As a Mum, I find it insulting as hell.

"All I dream about is what your generation had -" thus follows a list of things 'my generation' did not actually have.

Then follows a bunch of information about various issues. I know they only have a small space, I know it's oversimplified, and it's obviously designed to tug some heartstrings and play to compassion. I have no problem with that. But..

"I know you think of me already, and I don’t want to be pushy, but this election we’re at a crossroads, we’re deciding on the long-term path from here."

"Oh gosh, nope, I had no idea that this election was so important, thank you child for enlightening my ignorance with your wisdom and telling me how things are. After all, I'm a Mum, how could I possibly know these things without being told by you?"

*snarl*

And of course my main question is, "Why Mums? What about Dads?" Well apparently, "Because, when we're searching for answers, it tends to be the wisdom and nurturing hearts of our mums that guides us."

Because I apparently have fucking nurturing heart, through virtue of having pushed something the size of a watermelon out my vagina. And while my wisdom guides 'us', I am not wise enough to decide who to vote for without my kid's photo being attached to some patronising website and sent to me.

I know the guy's heart's in the right place, but I just feel patronised, insulted and stereotyped. Am I overreacting or do others see this too?

By the way, I voted Green - based on my research and understanding of politics and policy in combination with my values. And I didn't need to be told to do it by anyone else, mmk?

Comments:

[User Picture]
From:vernacularity
Date:November 25th, 2011 12:29 am (UTC)
(Link)
I hated that site as soon as i opened it. patronising. also, appalling site design.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:vernacularity
Date:November 25th, 2011 12:30 am (UTC)
(Link)
part of it is the whole whiney-brat thing. Muuuuuuuu-uuuuuuum.....
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:tatjna
Date:November 25th, 2011 12:32 am (UTC)
(Link)
I mostly disliked the assumption that:

a) Mums weren't already considering the future when choosing who to vote for.
b) We somehow need to be told to do this, and spoon fed selected information to convince us.

In other words, who exactly do the website creators think Mums are? And what does it say about what the creators think of their own Mum?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
From:decanker
Date:November 25th, 2011 01:46 am (UTC)

Re: And I didn't need to be told to do it by anyone else, mmk?

(Link)
Hey, so do I, which is why I didn't just say, Mum, vote Green, as much as I might have implied (any non-NACT party was fine by me).

I don't reckon it works to explicitly tell someone who to vote for. We all naturally get defensive.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:tatjna
Date:November 25th, 2011 01:49 am (UTC)

Re: And I didn't need to be told to do it by anyone else, mmk?

(Link)
The other day I suggested a colleague watch that thing on child poverty, and in the resulting discussion she explored a bunch of core values she had that she'd never equated with voting before. I have no idea who she'll vote for but I doubt very much it'll be National given her shock at some of the media-bollocks she's now aware of.

I call that a win. ;-)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
From:vernacularity
Date:November 25th, 2011 02:03 am (UTC)

Re: And I didn't need to be told to do it by anyone else, mmk?

(Link)
This, and sentences starting with "you have to see/read this" get me ranty.

100% !! This is something that is really irritating me about a number of the Occupy emailings/posts on the Coactivate site. If people are too damn lazy to tell me WHY I "have" to watch it, ie a short sentence saying "this is a movie that shows a person doing/telling such-and-such" or even "a short vid about X", then buggered if I am going to spend my time on it. I'd rather make meaningless jokes on faceborg.

The "you have to see this" comes across to me as "once you see this you will be utterly convinced exactly as I was, to think what I do", and the refusal to say what it is about is a variety of ambush.

Also, don't fucking tell ME what to do. Especially if you're a rights activist activising against being told how to live.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:pombagira
Date:November 25th, 2011 01:27 am (UTC)
(Link)
hmm.. i wanted there to be more infomation more clicky buttons but there wasn't which is dissapointing. having said that.. it would be less offensive? if it was not just directed at mums, and given from the comment the make of the website made, that it was meant for his mother, who i am guessing is in the same age bracket as mine.. the content is ok, (although i still want more indepth info) but also the content would should also be of interest to T, mums partner.. aka my step dad, casue he votes to.. *nods*...

*ponders*..

(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:decanker
Date:November 25th, 2011 02:01 am (UTC)
(Link)
I wanted more info too, I wanted to back up my lofty talk! But I simply ran out of time to get my links together :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]
From:_fustian
Date:November 25th, 2011 01:29 am (UTC)
(Link)
It seems to me that the site's designed to be personalised with a photo and sent to an individual. The targeting is therefore to be done by children who judge that their mothers are likely to respond positively to the message (ie. for whom it's perhaps more appropriate). If you haven't received it, it's not aimed at you. You're certainly free to take issue with the entire concept, but I'm not sure it's reasonable to criticise it on the assumption that you are its target.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:tatjna
Date:November 25th, 2011 02:10 am (UTC)
(Link)
Yes, as you will see from the comments here the creator of the site intended it for his Mum.

However, it remains that it's aimed at Mums and there is no equivalent for other people who may not vote according to your best interests.

Saying "if you haven't received it, it's not aimed at you" is kind of like saying that the sexist advertising tropes I see everywhere aren't aimed at me as a woman, because I don't buy lipstick/shoes/whatever.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]
From:t_c_da
Date:November 25th, 2011 01:35 am (UTC)
(Link)
A bit hard to refer my Mum to that site - she's been dead 17 years, and she lived in Australia all her life anyway...
(Reply) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)